Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 13 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2023-05-04 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport has an overall score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40's overall score of 77.2. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S5 Sport has the newer 4.4.2 version and Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13. The Galaxy S5 Sport is a older and somewhat thicker phone than the Motorola Edge 40, but Samsung made it a little bit lighter anyway.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor. The Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit better screen than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola Edge 40 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a much larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor and a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 40 has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 112 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 features a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.