Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 13 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 score. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a way newer and a little thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but it is also heavier. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 4 lesser processing cores and less RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light images, a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much larger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.