Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a global score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 score. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has the previous 14 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a extremely newer and just a bit thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's just a little heavier.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a sharper display than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a bigger display, a higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a bit greater pixel number per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a bigger aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.