Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, getting a score of 86.3 against 77.8. These devices include Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the older 14 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a way newer and just a little thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but it is heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a little bit worse count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a lot bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 496 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a way better resolution back facing camera, a much bigger sensor capturing much better quality photos and videos and a lot bigger aperture to take better low-light images and video.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 61% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.