Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Galaxy S5 Sport, having an 87.1 score against 77.8. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a really larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with an extra GPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much bigger sensor, a way larger camera aperture for better photos in low-light situations, better video frame rate and a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.