Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G is slightly better than Galaxy S5 Sport, getting an 81.5 score against 77.8. Even though Moto G 5G is noticeably newer than the Galaxy S5 Sport, it's somewhat thicker and notably heavier. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Moto G 5G has older 10 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a way smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Moto G 5G features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto G 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Motorola Moto G 5G shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
The Motorola Moto G 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 79 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.