Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), having a global score of 77.8 against 76.5. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is noticeably older than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021), it's body is incredibly lighter and a little thinner. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit better processing unit than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a much sharper screen than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. Moto G Power (2021) captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Moto G Power (2021) also has higher 60 fps video frame rates, a way larger camera aperture, a much better resolution back facing camera and a way bigger camera sensor.
The Moto G Power (2021) features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 48 GB more internal storage. The Moto G Power (2021) features a really longer battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Power (2021). So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Moto G Power (2021), giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.