Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 13 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2023-06-02 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a general score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s score of 76. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is an notably older cellphone than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but Samsung managed to make it a little bit thinner and lighter anyway. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has newer 4.4.2 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13, counting with lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a way smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a little greater pixels density. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S5 Sport features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has 4 lesser CPU cores and 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a much smaller back camera sensor shooting lot lower quality images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a larger aperture and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.