Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has a score of 86.2, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's score of 77.8. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G200 5G has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. The Moto G200 5G construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's extremely heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a much better looking screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better screen pixel density. The Moto G200 5G features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Moto G200 5G features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and more RAM. The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.