Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 13 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2023-09-14 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | -- |
| Blue and Red | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | -- |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G84 is a bit better than Galaxy S5 Sport, getting a score of 80.9 against 77.8. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G84 has older 13 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. Moto G84 is a way newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and extremely lighter than Galaxy S5 Sport.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a much greater processing power than Moto G84, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Galaxy S5 Sport has just a bit better looking display than Moto G84, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel number per screen inch.
Moto G84 shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G84 also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, faster video frame rate and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography.
Motorola Moto G84 features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Moto G84 has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.