Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-08-28 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has an overall score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than Moto G9 Play's 76.7 overall score. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a more recent 4.4.2 version while Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version, providing a couple additional features. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport design is a bit thinner and noticeably lighter than Moto G9 Play, although it was released many years before.
The Galaxy S5 Sport features a much more vibrant screen than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1920 x 1080px resolution and a much better screen pixel density. Galaxy S5 Sport features a little faster CPU than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
Moto G9 Play takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G9 Play also has a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera, faster video frame rates and a way bigger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low light environments.
The Moto G9 Play counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 48 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G9 Play counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.