Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-12-05 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G9 Power is a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport, having a 78.6 score against 77.8. The Moto G9 Power design is extremely newer than the Galaxy S5 Sport's, but it's a bit thicker and notably heavier. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G9 Power has the previous 10 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a little bit better performance than Moto G9 Power, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. The Galaxy S5 Sport features a much more vibrant screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px and much more pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola Moto G9 Power has a much better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has higher video frame rates, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a back-facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G9 Power features a very superior storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto G9 Power features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 114 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.