Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-06-23 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a global score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 score. Galaxy S5 Sport is a noticeably older and thicker cellphone than the Moto Z Force, but Samsung managed to build it just a little bit lighter anyway. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy S5 Sport has older 4.4.2 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit sharper display than Moto Z Force, although it has a just a little worse screen density, a bit smaller screen and a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit better performance than Moto Z Force, because although it has 2 GB less RAM, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a graphics processing unit.
Moto Z Force features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto Z Force also has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a larger aperture for better low light photography and video.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Although Galaxy S5 Sport is a better device, it is more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Moto Z Force, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.