Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a global score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 global score. Galaxy S5 Sport's design is noticeably older, a little heavier and noticeably thicker than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition's processor is very similar to the Galaxy S5 Sport one, because although the Moto Z2 Force Edition has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (but slower) and 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it has a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, a little smaller screen and a little bit worse display density. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport captures a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and a larger back camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 48 GB more internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a little better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3% bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is also by far the cheapest one, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.