Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a global score of 77.8, which is slightly better than Moto Z2 Play's score of 77.4. The Galaxy S5 Sport is a much older, incredibly thicker and a little bit heavier phone than Moto Z2 Play. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit better processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a much better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a just a little better display density. Galaxy S5 Sport features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Moto Z2 Play features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z2 Play features a bit better battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z2 Play. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Moto Z2 Play, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.