Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2014-06-23 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3, having a 77.8 score against 77.6. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy S5 Sport is a way older, incredibly thicker and a little bit heavier phone than Motorola Moto Z3. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy S5 Sport has an older 4.4.2 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Moto Z3's processor is just as good as the Galaxy S5 Sport one, because although the Moto Z3 has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more cpu cores and more RAM memory. Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a better looking display than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a larger back camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
Moto Z3 features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport costs a little more money than the Moto Z3, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.