Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Oxford blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G has a general score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 general score. Motorola One 5G is a heavier phone than Galaxy S5 Sport, but they are 0.35inches thick. Galaxy S5 Sport features a little better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a better looking display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater display pixels density. The Motorola One 5G has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also has a camera with lot more mega-pixels, a much larger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures and a way bigger aperture to take better photos in low light environments.
Motorola One 5G features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 112 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola One 5G counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 79 percent more battery capacity.
The Motorola One 5G costs more money than Galaxy S5 Sport, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.