Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than the Galaxy S5 Sport, with a 79.8 score against 77.8. The Motorola One Hyper is a much heavier phone than Galaxy S5 Sport, but they have the same thickness. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola One Hyper has 11 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has 2 GB less RAM and 4 less CPU cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a much better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Hyper has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Motorola One Hyper has a better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Hyper also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better images in poorly lited situations and a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, else you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.