Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is just a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport, getting a general score of 80.7 against 77.8. The Motorola One Vision design is newer and just a little thinner than Galaxy S5 Sport's, although it's heavier. The Galaxy S5 Sport has a more vivid screen than Motorola One Vision, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a little bit smaller screen and a quite worse pixels number in each inch in the screen.
Motorola One Vision features a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB and more internal storage. Galaxy S5 Sport counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
Motorola One Vision has greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh. The Motorola One Vision has a better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Vision also has a camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution, a much larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.