Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 12 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2022-08-18 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue and Red | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2022) is a bit better than Galaxy S5 Sport, getting an 81.1 score against 77.8. The Motorola razr (2022) body is notably newer and thinner, but way heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2022) has 12 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Motorola razr (2022) features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and more cores. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a sharper screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater display density.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Motorola razr (2022) features greater battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Motorola razr (2022) takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.