Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 15 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue and Red | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 432 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, getting a general score of 79.2 against 77.8. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s construction is way newer and thinner, but also incredibly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has 15 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lot smaller display. The Galaxy S5 Sport has a much greater performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 less CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a GPU.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 68% more battery capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, a bigger camera aperture and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.