Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-06-23 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a global score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 overall score. The Galaxy S5 Sport is an noticeably older cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's a bit thinner and lighter anyway. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S5 Sport has an older 4.4.2 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 10 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S5 Sport features a sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater number of pixels per inch of display.
The nubia Red Magic 3S captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a way bigger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures, a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, a much bigger camera aperture for better images and video in low-light situations and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 79 percent more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S5 Sport is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.