Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a score of 77.8, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 global score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S5 Sport has newer 4.4.2 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version, providing the user some extra features and performance tweaks. Galaxy S5 Sport is an extremely older and somewhat thicker cellphone than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, but Samsung managed to build it just a little lighter anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a slightly better looking display than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little bit higher screen pixels density. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a much greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a way larger aperture to take better low-light photos and video, a much bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4025mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.