Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2023-12-16 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, having a general score of 77.8 against 77.4. Although the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a lot older and a little thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, it's design is still a lot lighter. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has the newer 4.4.2 version and Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a much faster processing unit than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a little worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 112 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A15 5G features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Galaxy S5 Sport is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A15 5G. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy A15 5G, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.