Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-07-02 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport is slightly better than the Galaxy A22, getting a 77.8 score against 76.1. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S5 Sport has newer 4.4.2 version and Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version, giving some extra features and a performance increase. Although Galaxy S5 Sport is older and a bit thicker than the Galaxy A22, it's design is still lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a lot better display than Galaxy A22, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a lot greater screen pixels density. Galaxy A22 counts with a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a GPU. Galaxy S5 Sport captures clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a much less mega pixels camera in the back and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.