Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a global score of 79.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's general score of 77.8. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's design is extremely newer and just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy S5 Sport's, although it is somewhat heavier. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has the previous 14 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
Galaxy S5 Sport features an extremely better processor than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and less RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better count of pixels in each inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 112 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 79% greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a way better 50 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.