Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue and Red | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G has a global score of 79.4, which is a bit better than Galaxy S5 Sport's score of 77.8. Galaxy A35 5G's design is way newer and a little thinner, but also extremely heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A35 5G has the older 14 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a much smaller display and a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density. Galaxy A35 5G has a superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Galaxy A35 5G takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality photographs, a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 79 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.