Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, with a score of 83.8 against 77.8. The Galaxy A50 is a extremely newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but it is a bit heavier. Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A50, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The Galaxy S5 Sport features a sharper display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit lower 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density. Galaxy A50 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a much bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures.
The Galaxy A50 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A50 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 43 percent more battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.