Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's score of 77.8. The Samsung Galaxy A51 body is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's, but it is just a bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra GPU. The Galaxy S5 Sport features a sharper display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little better number of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A51 shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A51 also has a larger aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations, a back facing camera with a way higher 48 MP resolution and a lot bigger sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A51 is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.