Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Galaxy S5 Sport, having a score of 90.8 against 77.8. Even though Galaxy A51 5G is heavier than Galaxy S5 Sport, it's just a little bit thinner and also a lot newer. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a better screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density. The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality pictures and videos, a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and video and a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G features a superior battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G costs a little more money than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.