Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and Red | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A52's design is extremely newer and just a bit thinner, but also heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport. The Galaxy S5 Sport has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a much smaller display and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB and 112 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Galaxy A52 captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also has a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and video and a back-facing camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A52 features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.