Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and Red | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is better than Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 score. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a notably newer and just a little bit thinner cellphone than Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's also heavier.
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less processing cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Galaxy S5 Sport has a much better looking display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a much smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher screen density.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 112 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 61 percent greater battery size.
Galaxy A52 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a way bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and pictures, a larger aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.