Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is better than the Galaxy S5 Sport, with a score of 88.1 against 77.8. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy F62 has the previous 11 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. The Galaxy F62 design is much newer than Galaxy S5 Sport's, but it is just a little bit thicker and heavier.
Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core CPU, the Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos, a larger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 112 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy F62 features a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.