Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2014-06-23 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, getting a overall score of 78.9 against 77.8. The Galaxy M20 design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but it is somewhat heavier. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M20 has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
The Galaxy S5 Sport features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy M20 features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit better processing power than Galaxy M20, because although it has lesser cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a really longer battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 79 percent bigger battery size.
The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures in low light environments, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a larger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos and a better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.