Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 432 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is much better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 general score. Even though Samsung Galaxy M51 is noticeably newer than Galaxy S5 Sport, it is incredibly heavier and just a little bit thicker. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has 10 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy M51, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a sharper screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better amount of pixels in each inch of screen.
Galaxy M51 features a much better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy M51 also has a way larger sensor shooting much better quality photographs and videos, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Galaxy M51 features a much better memory for applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.