Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's general score of 77.8. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's construction is way newer and a little bit thinner, but heavier than Galaxy S5 Sport. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and 6 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater display density. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 features a way better battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a lot less megapixels back camera, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S5 Sport. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy S5 Sport, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.