Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport
SM-G860Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than Galaxy S5 Sport, getting an 81.2 score against 77.8. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. Galaxy Note 3's design is a little thinner than the Galaxy S5 Sport, although it is a little heavier and was released just 10 months before.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a 450 megahertz GPU and the same number of cores. Galaxy S5 Sport has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1920 x 1080px, the Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows 64 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a F2.2 diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport also has a larger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures and a camera in the back with more mega-pixels.
Galaxy Note 3 has a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3200mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.