Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is better than Galaxy S5 Sport, with a global score of 89 against 77.8. Samsung Galaxy Note10's body is much newer and somewhat thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport. Galaxy Note10 features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a brighter display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixel density. The Galaxy Note10 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a lot lower resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality photos and videos and a lot bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with longer battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S5 Sport. If you want to save some money, you can get Galaxy S5 Sport, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.