Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, with an 86.3 score against 77.8. The Samsung Galaxy S10e construction is incredibly newer, somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, although it has a bit worse display pixel density, a little smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. Galaxy S10e shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a way lower resolution back-facing camera and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a lot larger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a larger back camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features much more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S10e features a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3100mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e costs more than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.