Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | -- |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 5.57 ounces | -- |
| Blue and Red | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. Samsung Galaxy S25 is a much lighter and incredibly thinner device than the Galaxy S5 Sport.
Galaxy S25 counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a much better performing processor than Galaxy S25, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Galaxy S25 counts with much more memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy S25 has a really longer battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 captures way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a much better video resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low light images and videos, a lot bigger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a lot more MP back facing camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S5 Sport. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy S5 Sport, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.