Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | -- |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 5.57 ounces | -- |
| Blue and Red | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, getting a score of 90.7 against 77.8. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is lighter and notably thinner than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a really superior processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and less cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a way larger screen, a way higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little greater pixels quantity in each inch of screen.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a greater camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a camera with a way higher 200 mega pixels resolution, a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a much larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a way larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.