Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, getting an 85.6 score against 77.8. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 3 is somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, it's incredibly thinner and incredibly newer.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S5 Sport features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking images and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 features longer battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S5 Sport. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S5 Sport, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.