Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, getting a 92.3 score against 77.8. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a extremely newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but it is somewhat heavier. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 6 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and videos in low-light situations.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.