Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 general score. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is noticeably newer and noticeably thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's, although it's extremely heavier.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a really smaller display and a lot lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of cores (and faster). The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S5 Sport features a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a F2.2 aperture, the Galaxy S5 Sport also has a much better 16 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.