Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than Galaxy S5 Sport's overall score of 77.8. Xiaomi Black Shark 3's construction is incredibly newer, but somewhat thicker and extremely heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has 10 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater amount of pixels in each inch in the display. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a little better processing power than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a larger aperture, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, better video frame rate and a much bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 69% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.