Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is much better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's global score of 77.8. These phones include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a incredibly heavier cellphone than the Galaxy S5 Sport, but they are equally thin.
Galaxy S5 Sport features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a way higher video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 68 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.