Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 overall score. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's body is extremely newer than Galaxy S5 Sport's, although it's a bit thicker and incredibly heavier. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has 10 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
The Galaxy S5 Sport and the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC feature really similar CPUs, because although the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. The Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a much smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a little better amount of pixels per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 256 GB and 64 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a lot better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments, a way bigger camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs and a much higher 64 MP resolution back camera.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has an 84 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.