Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-03-24 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy S5 Sport, with a general score of 82.4 against 77.8. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has the older 11 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro construction is way newer and just a little thinner than the Galaxy S5 Sport's, but it is also heavier.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display and a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixels density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a processor that is just as good as the CPU in Galaxy S5 Sport, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores (but slower) and a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a much more megapixels camera and a larger aperture.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.