Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S6
64 GBSM-G920F
| Global Score | |
| 85.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-04-11 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminium and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2550mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6, having a global score of 87.1 against 85.1. The LG Velvet body is incredibly newer, but thicker and a lot heavier than Samsung Galaxy S6. The Galaxy S6 features a way better looking display than LG Velvet, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a better screen density.
The LG Velvet counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S6 has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG Velvet, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S6 also counts with a 64 bits processor and a graphics co-processor.
The LG Velvet counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy S6, because it has a 4300mAh battery size. LG Velvet takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the LG Velvet also has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs and a larger aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations.
The LG Velvet is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.