Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | iOS 15.x |
| -- | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 10.08 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 has an overall score of 91.5, which is better than Galaxy S6 Active's 80.9 general score. The iPhone 13 counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy S6 Active comes with Android 5.0 OS. The iPhone 13 features a bit better performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit and lesser cores , and they both have a 64-bits CPU, the iPhone 13 also counts with more RAM.
The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a little sharper display than iPhone 13, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a little bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. IPhone 13 counts with a superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S6 Active features a bit longer battery lifetime than iPhone 13, because it has an 8 percent more battery size. Apple iPhone 13 has a much better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a worse video definition and a lot less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Although iPhone 13 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.